The different subtelomeric structure among 1RS arms in wheat-rye 1BL.1RS translocations affecting their meiotic recombination and inducing their structural variation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 1RS arm of wheat-rye 1BL.1RS translocations contains several subtelomeric tandem repeat families. To study the effect of the difference in the composition of these tandem repeats on the meiotic recombination of 1RS arms can help to enrich the genetic diversity of 1BL.1RS translocation chromosomes. RESULTS: Five wheat-rye 1BL.1RS translocation cultivars/lines were used to build two cross combinations including group 1 (20T401 × Zhou 8425B, 20T401 × Lovrin 10 and 20T401 × Chuannong 17) and group 2 (20T360-2 × Zhou 8425B, 20T360-2 × Lovrin 10 and 20T360-2 × Chuannong 17). Oligonucleotide (oligo) probes Oligo-s120.3, Oligo-TR72, and Oligo-119.2-2 produced the same signal pattern on the 1RS arms in lines 20T401 and 20T360-2, and another signal pattern in the three cultivars Zhou 8425B, Lovrin 10 and Chuannong 17. The Oligo-pSc200 signal disappeared from the 1RS arms of the line 20T401, and the signal intensity of this probe on the 1RS arms of the line 20T360-2 was weaker than that of the three cultivars. The five cultivars/lines had the same signal pattern of the probe Oligo-pSc250. The recombination rate of 1RS arms in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2. In the progenies from group 1, unequal meiotic recombination in the subtelomeric pSc119.2 and pSc250 tandem repeat regions, and a 1BL.1RS with inversion of 1RS segment between the pSc200 and the nucleolar organizer region were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a visual tool to detect the meiotic recombination of 1RS arms. The meiotic recombination rate of 1RS arms was affected by the variation of pSc200 tandem repeat, indicating the similar composition of subtelomeric tandem repeats on these arms could increase their recombination rate. These results indicate that the 1RS subtelomeric structure will affect its recombination, and thus the localization of genes on 1RS by means of meiotic recombination might also be affected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".