MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385771869 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4532527

Submission on the first draft general recommendation no. 37 (2023) on racial discrimination in the enjoyment of the right to health

2023· article· en· W4385771869 on OpenAlexaff
Roojin Habibi, Matiangai Sirleaf, Judith Bueno de Mesquita, Gian Luca Burci, Stéphanie Dagron, Mark Eccleston-Turner, Luciano Bottini Filho, Lisa Forman, Sam Halabi, Tsung-Ling Lee, Benjamin Mason Meier, Stefania Negri, Alexandra Phelan, Sharifah Sekalala, Allyn L. Taylor, Alicia Ely Yamin

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiscrimination and Equality Law
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoYork UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHullPsychologySocial psychologyEnvironmental healthApplied psychologyMedicineEngineeringMarine engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0380.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4650.487

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicDiscrimination and Equality LawFrench-language works237,207