MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385792363 · doi:10.5376/jtsr.2023.13.0002

The Origin and Distribution of Tea Trees and Tea in China

2023· article· en· W4385792363 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chuchu Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Tea Science Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaDistribution (mathematics)Green teaMathematicsGeographyBiologyFood scienceArchaeologyMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tea (Camellia sinensis) originated from wild tea trees in the mountains of southern China, and after thousands of years of domestication and cultivation, China has developed major tea-producing regions with abundant tea resources and numerous excellent tea varieties.Tea not only holds an important position in China's history and culture, but it is also one of China's important economic crops.Since ancient times, Chinese people have loved drinking tea.The cultivation, production, and art of tea drinking, as well as tea culture, have had a profound impact on people's way of life, thinking, and social communication.This review explores the history of tea and its significant impact on Chinese culture, as well as the origin and domestication process of tea trees.It analyzes the main distribution regions and characteristics of tea trees in China, and summarizes recent research progress on the origin and distribution of Chinese tea trees and tea.The review provides a reference for further research on the quality of Chinese tea and the preservation of tea tree germplasm resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Tea Science ResearchSame topicPlant and Fungal Species DescriptionsFrench-language works237,207