Dinamika Inklusi Sosial Masyakarat Islam: Posisi Kaum Mawali Dalam Pembangunan Umat Islam Di Jazirah Arab
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inklusi sosial menjadi satu konsep formal yang ada dalam Islam. Konsep inilah yang terlihat dalam beberapa periode sejarah berlatar pembangunan peradaban Islam masa klasik. Paada masa Nabi SAW sampai masa Khulafa Al-Rasydun kaum mawali mendapat tempat yang adil. Mereka terpinggirkan pada masa Umayyah, akibat hegemoni Arabisme. Kaum mawali mulai berkontribusi penuh dalam peradaban Islam pada masa Abbasiyah untuk berkolaborasi membangun umat secara bersama. Karena tujuan utama dari inklusi sosial adalah kemakmuran bagi semua orang, maka konsep ini harus berpedoman pada nilai-nilai agama agar menjurus kepada kebaikan. Penelitian ini ingin menjelaskan penerapan inklusi sosial umat Islam di Jazirah Arab sebagai satu proses persatuan Muslim Arab dan Muslim non-Arab dalam peradaban Islam. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian sejarah meliputi heuristik, kritik, interpretasi, dan historiografi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, inklusi sosial berlandaskan nilai-nilai Islam yaitu ukhuwah islamiyah, tasamuh, dan ishlah dapat mempersatukan umat Islam dalam membangun kemakmuran bersama di Jazirah Arab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it