Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Following Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Infants with Severe Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is an effective pulmonary vasodilator. However, the efficacy of iNO in former premature infants with established bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has not been studied. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of iNO in reducing pulmonary artery pressure in infants with severe BPD as measured by echocardiography. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational study enrolling infants born at less than 32 weeks gestation and in whom (1) iNO therapy was initiated after admission to our institution, or (2) at the outside institution less than 48 h before transfer and received an echocardiogram prior to iNO initiation, and (3) had severe BPD. Data were collected at three time-points: (1) before iNO; (2) 12-48 h after initiation of iNO; and (3) 48-168 h after initiation of iNO. The primary outcome was the effect of iNO on pulmonary artery pressure measured by echocardiography in patients with severe BPD between 48 and 168 h after initiating iNO therapy. RESULTS: Of 37 enrolled, 81% had echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) before iNO and 56% after 48 h of iNO (p = 0.04). FiO2 requirements were significantly different between time-points (1) and (3) (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences between Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE) Z-Scores, time to peak velocity: right ventricular ejection time (TPV:RVET), and ventilator changes. CONCLUSIONS: Although we found a statistically significant reduction of PAH between time-point (1) and (3), future trials are needed to further guide clinical care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".