MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385799640 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c03186

Targeted Workflow Investigating Variations in the Tear Proteome by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2023· article· en· W4385799640 on OpenAlexafffund
Maggy Lépine, Oriana Zambito, Lekha Sleno

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsProteomeProteomicsTandem mass spectrometryChemistryComputational biologyMass spectrometryChromatographyLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometrySelected reaction monitoringBioinformaticsBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteins in tears have an important role in eye health and have been shown as a promising source of disease biomarkers. The goal of this study was to develop a robust, sensitive, and targeted method for profiling tear proteins to examine the variability within a group of healthy volunteers over three days. Inter-individual and inter-day variabilities were examined to contribute to understanding the normal variations in the tear proteome, as well as to establish which proteins may be better candidates as eventual biomarkers of specific diseases. Tear samples collected on Schirmer strips were subjected to bottom-up proteomics, and resulting peptides were analyzed using an optimized targeted method measuring 226 proteins by liquid chromatography-scheduled multiple reaction monitoring. This method was developed using an in-house database of identified proteins from tears compiled from high-resolution data-dependent liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry data. The measurement of unique peptide signals can help better understand the dynamics of each of these proteins in tears. Some interesting trends were seen in specific pathways or protein classes, including higher variabilities for those involved in glycolysis, glutathione metabolism, and cytoskeleton proteins and lower variation for those involving the degradation of the extracellular matrix. The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the field of tear proteomics with the development of a novel and targeted method that is highly amenable to the clinical laboratory using high flow LC and commonly used triple quadrupole mass spectrometry while ensuring that protein quantitation was reported based on unique peptides for each protein and robust peak areas with data normalization. These results report on variabilities on over 200 proteins that are robustly detected in tear samples from healthy volunteers with a simple sample preparation procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicOcular Surface and Contact LensFrench-language works237,207