Targeted Workflow Investigating Variations in the Tear Proteome by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteins in tears have an important role in eye health and have been shown as a promising source of disease biomarkers. The goal of this study was to develop a robust, sensitive, and targeted method for profiling tear proteins to examine the variability within a group of healthy volunteers over three days. Inter-individual and inter-day variabilities were examined to contribute to understanding the normal variations in the tear proteome, as well as to establish which proteins may be better candidates as eventual biomarkers of specific diseases. Tear samples collected on Schirmer strips were subjected to bottom-up proteomics, and resulting peptides were analyzed using an optimized targeted method measuring 226 proteins by liquid chromatography-scheduled multiple reaction monitoring. This method was developed using an in-house database of identified proteins from tears compiled from high-resolution data-dependent liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry data. The measurement of unique peptide signals can help better understand the dynamics of each of these proteins in tears. Some interesting trends were seen in specific pathways or protein classes, including higher variabilities for those involved in glycolysis, glutathione metabolism, and cytoskeleton proteins and lower variation for those involving the degradation of the extracellular matrix. The overall aim of this study was to contribute to the field of tear proteomics with the development of a novel and targeted method that is highly amenable to the clinical laboratory using high flow LC and commonly used triple quadrupole mass spectrometry while ensuring that protein quantitation was reported based on unique peptides for each protein and robust peak areas with data normalization. These results report on variabilities on over 200 proteins that are robustly detected in tear samples from healthy volunteers with a simple sample preparation procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".