Efficient QAOA Optimization using Directed Restarts and Graph Lookup
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQA) aim to enhance the capabilities of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. These algorithms utilize parameterized circuits and classical optimizers to iteratively execute circuits with varying parameters. However, VQA faces computational overheads due to repeated iterations and random restarts. Prior work suggests using basic sub-graphs to transfer parameters for the input graph, reducing optimizer overheads but limiting applicability to structured regular graphs. In real-world applications, random irregular graphs are common, and existing methods are not scalable or practical for such graphs. This paper presents a framework that aims to improve random irregular graphs in VQA. The framework uses graph similarity and important features like total edge counts, average edge counts, and variance. It follows an iterative process to choose basis sub-graphs from a small database and adjust parameters accordingly. Classical optimizers then utilize these parameters to determine when to restart and perform gradient descent. This approach increases the chances of reaching global maximum points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".