Linking niche size and phylogenetic signals to predict future soil microbial relative abundances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacteria provide ecosystem services (e.g., biogeochemical cycling) that regulate climate, purify water, and produce food and other commodities, yet their distribution and likely responses to change or intervention are difficult to predict. Using bacterial 16S rRNA gene surveys of 1,381 soil samples from the Biomes of Australian Soil Environment (BASE) dataset, we were able to model relative abundances of soil bacterial taxonomic groups and describe bacterial niche space and optima. Hold out sample validated hypothetical causal networks (structural equation models; SEM) were able to predict the relative abundances of bacterial taxa from environmental data and elucidate soil bacterial niche space. By using explanatory SEM properties as indicators of microbial traits, we successfully predicted soil bacterial response, and in turn potential ecosystem service response, to near-term expected changes in the Australian climate. The methods developed enable prediction of continental-scale changes in bacterial relative abundances, and demonstrate their utility in predicting changes in bacterial function and thereby ecosystem services. These capabilities will be strengthened in the future with growing genome-level data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".