SwinFSR: Stereo Image Super-Resolution using SwinIR and Frequency Domain Knowledge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stereo Image Super-Resolution (stereoSR) has attracted significant attention in recent years due to the extensive deployment of dual cameras in mobile phones, autonomous vehicles and robots. In this work, we propose a new StereoSR method, named SwinFSR, based on an extension of SwinIR, originally designed for single image restoration, and the frequency domain knowledge obtained by the Fast Fourier Convolution (FFC). Specifically, to effectively gather global information, we modify the Residual Swin Transformer blocks (RSTBs) in SwinIR by explicitly incorporating the frequency domain knowledge using the FFC and employing the resulting residual Swin Fourier Transformer blocks (RSFTBs) for feature extraction. Besides, for the efficient and accurate fusion of stereo views, we propose a new cross-attention module referred to as RCAM, which achieves highly competitive performance while requiring less computational cost than the state-of-the-art cross-attention modules. Extensive experimental results and ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed SwinFSR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".