Unveiling the Role of Sorghum RPAP3 in the Function of R2TP Complex: Insights into Protein Assembly in Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chaperone R2TP has multiple subunits that assist in the proper folding, assembly, and stabilization of various protein complexes in cells and its study can offer valuable insights into the regulation and maintenance of protein assemblies in plant systems. The 'T' component of R2TP is Tah1 in yeast, consisting of 111 residues, while its counterpart in humans is RPAP3, with 665 residues. RPAP3 acts as a co-chaperone of Hsp90 and facilitates interactions between RUVBL proteins and other complex components, enhancing the recruitment of client proteins by the R2TP complex. These facts further underscore the relevance of studying this complex in different organisms. The putative gene corresponding to the RPAP3 in Sorghum bicolor, a monocotyledon plant, was cloned, and the protein (396 residues) purified for biochemical characterization. SbRPAP3 exists as a folded monomer and has a RPAP3 domain, which is present in human RPAP3 but absent in yeast Tah1. SbRPAP3 retains its functional capabilities, including binding with RUVBLs, Hsp90, and Hsp70. By elucidating the role of RPAP3 in plant R2TP complex, we can further comprehend the molecular mechanisms underlying plant-specific protein assembly and contribute to advancements in plant biology and biotechnological applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".