MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385805976 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.025203

Constraints on the onset of color transparency from quasielastic <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> up to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>14.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.222222em"/><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2023· article· lv· W4385805976 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Bhetuwal, John C. Matter, Holly Szumila-Vance, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, M. L. Kabir, D. Dutta, R. Ent, D. Abrams, Z. Ahmed, B. Aljawrneh, S. Alsalmi, R. Ambrose, D. Androić, W. Armstrong, A. Asaturyan, K. Assumin-Gyimah, Anashe Bandari, S. Basnet, В. В. Бердников, H. Bhatt, D. Biswas, W. U. Boeglin, P. Bosted, E. J. Brash, M. H. S. Bukhari, H. Chen, J. P. Chen, M. Chen, E. M. Christy, S. Covrig, K. Craycraft, S. Danagoulian, Donal B. Day, M. Diefenthaler, M. Dlamini, J. Dunne, B. Duran, R. B. Evans, H. Fenker, N. Fomin, E. Fuchey, D. Gaskell, T. N. Gautam, F. A. Gonzalez, O. Hansen, F. Hauenstein, Andres Vargas Hernandez, T. Horn, G. M. Huber, M. Jones, S. Joosten, A. Karki, C. Keppel, A. Khanal, P. M. King, E. Kinney, H. S. Ko, M. Köhl, N. Lashley-Colthirst, S. Li, W. B. Li, A. H. Liyanage, D. Mack, S. Malace, P. Markowitz, D. Meekins, R. Michaels, A. Mkrtchyan, H. Mkrtchyan, S. J. Nazeer, S. Nanda, G. Niculescu, I. Niculescu, D. Nguyen, Nuruzzaman Nuruzzaman, B. Pandey, S. Park, E. Pooser, A. J. R. Puckett, M. Rehfuss, J. Reinhold, N. Santiesteban, B. Sawatzky, G. R. Smith, A. Sun, V. Tadevosyan, R. Trotta, S. A. Wood, C. Yero, J. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsMomentum (technical analysis)ElectronNuclear physicsSpectrometerPosition and momentum spaceQuantum chromodynamicsMomentum transferParticle physicsScatteringOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quasielastic scattering on $^{12}\mathrm{C}(e,{e}^{\ensuremath{'}}p)$ was measured in Hall C at Jefferson Lab for spacelike four-momentum transfer squared ${Q}^{2}$ in the range of $8\text{--}14.2\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}{(\mathrm{GeV}/c)}^{2}$ with proton momenta up to $8.3\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GeV}/c$. The experiment was carried out in the upgraded Hall C at Jefferson Lab. It used the existing high-momentum spectrometer and the new super-high-momentum spectrometer to detect the scattered electrons and protons in coincidence. The nuclear transparency was extracted as the ratio of the measured yield to the yield calculated in the plane wave impulse approximation. Additionally, the transparency of the $1{s}_{1/2}$ and $1{p}_{3/2}$ shell protons in $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ was extracted, and the asymmetry of the missing momentum distribution was examined for hints of the quantum chromodynamics prediction of color transparency. All of these results were found to be consistent with traditional nuclear physics and inconsistent with the onset of color transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.014
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0110.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0150.014
Research integrity0.0120.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3410.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207