MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385805976 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.025203

Constraints on the onset of color transparency from quasielastic <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>12</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> up to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>14.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.222222em"/><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2023· article· lv· W4385805976 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Bhetuwal, John C. Matter, Holly Szumila-Vance, C. Ayerbe Gayoso, M. L. Kabir, D. Dutta, R. Ent, D. Abrams, Z. Ahmed, B. Aljawrneh, S. Alsalmi, R. Ambrose, D. Androić, W. Armstrong, A. Asaturyan, K. Assumin-Gyimah, Anashe Bandari, S. Basnet, В. В. Бердников, H. Bhatt, D. Biswas, W. U. Boeglin, P. Bosted, E. J. Brash, M. H. S. Bukhari, H. Chen, J. P. Chen, M. Chen, E. M. Christy, S. Covrig, K. Craycraft, S. Danagoulian, Donal B. Day, M. Diefenthaler, M. Dlamini, J. Dunne, B. Duran, R. B. Evans, H. Fenker, N. Fomin, E. Fuchey, D. Gaskell, T. N. Gautam, F. A. Gonzalez, O. Hansen, F. Hauenstein, Andres Vargas Hernandez, T. Horn, G. M. Huber, M. Jones, S. Joosten, A. Karki, C. Keppel, A. Khanal, P. M. King, E. Kinney, H. S. Ko, M. Köhl, N. Lashley-Colthirst, S. Li, W. B. Li, A. H. Liyanage, D. Mack, S. Malace, P. Markowitz, D. Meekins, R. Michaels, A. Mkrtchyan, H. Mkrtchyan, S. J. Nazeer, S. Nanda, G. Niculescu, I. Niculescu, D. Nguyen, Nuruzzaman Nuruzzaman, B. Pandey, S. Park, E. Pooser, A. J. R. Puckett, M. Rehfuss, J. Reinhold, N. Santiesteban, B. Sawatzky, G. R. Smith, A. Sun, V. Tadevosyan, R. Trotta, S. A. Wood, C. Yero, J. Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsMomentum (technical analysis)ElectronNuclear physicsSpectrometerPosition and momentum spaceQuantum chromodynamicsMomentum transferParticle physicsScatteringOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quasielastic scattering on $^{12}\mathrm{C}(e,{e}^{\ensuremath{'}}p)$ was measured in Hall C at Jefferson Lab for spacelike four-momentum transfer squared ${Q}^{2}$ in the range of $8\text{--}14.2\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}{(\mathrm{GeV}/c)}^{2}$ with proton momenta up to $8.3\phantom{\rule{0.222222em}{0ex}}\mathrm{GeV}/c$. The experiment was carried out in the upgraded Hall C at Jefferson Lab. It used the existing high-momentum spectrometer and the new super-high-momentum spectrometer to detect the scattered electrons and protons in coincidence. The nuclear transparency was extracted as the ratio of the measured yield to the yield calculated in the plane wave impulse approximation. Additionally, the transparency of the $1{s}_{1/2}$ and $1{p}_{3/2}$ shell protons in $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ was extracted, and the asymmetry of the missing momentum distribution was examined for hints of the quantum chromodynamics prediction of color transparency. All of these results were found to be consistent with traditional nuclear physics and inconsistent with the onset of color transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207