MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385809006 · doi:10.1002/ett.4842

Intelligent multimedia content delivery in 5G/6G networks: A reinforcement learning approach

2023· article· en· W4385809006 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Jamshaid Iqbal, Muhammad Farhan, Farhan Ullah, Gautam Srivastava, Sohail Jabbar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Parking Systems Research
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReinforcement learningMultimediaScalabilityMulti-frequency networkComputer networkBandwidth (computing)Wireless networkWirelessHeterogeneous networkTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multimedia content in 5G/6G networks makes safe, confidential, and efficient content delivery difficult. Intelligent systems that adapt to the ever‐changing network environment are needed to distribute multimedia content in these networks. Reinforcement learning (RL) can optimize multimedia content distribution based on network congestion, capacity, and user preferences. This study proposes RL‐based intelligent multimedia content distribution. RL algorithms learn from the network environment and generate optimum judgments incorporating several aspects of the suggested framework. The framework delivers multimedia material securely and privately with great quality. This study provides an intelligent multimedia content delivery architecture that uses RL approaches to solve 5G/6G content delivery problems. This research presents an RL system optimized with the double DQN algorithm having a reward of 51604.93 in 7000 episodes for efficient video file sharing on intracity buses. The RL agent balances network congestion and bandwidth by leveraging multiple sources such as bus and intersection caches and base stations, improving secure multimedia content delivery in 5G/6G networks and enhancing the passenger experience. The study confirms the system's effectiveness using reward and loss metrics and identifies potential future research directions. Future work could explore additional RL algorithms, scalability for larger networks, complex delivery scenarios, and integration with blockchain and edge computing for improved security and efficiency in multimedia content delivery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions on Emerging Telecommunications TechnologiesSame topicSmart Parking Systems ResearchFrench-language works237,207