MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385815385 · doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2022-0011

Inverse Design of Strained Graphene Surfaces for Electron Control

2023· article· en· W4385815385 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Computational Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCarleton UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrapheneInverseElectronMaterials sciencePhysicsNanotechnologyQuantum mechanicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is devoted to the inverse design of strained graphene surfaces for the control of electrons in the semi-classical optical-like regime. Assuming that charge carriers are described by the Dirac equation in curved-space and exploiting the fact that wave propagation can be described by ray-optics in this regime, a general computational strategy is proposed in order to find strain fields associated with a desired effective refractive index profile. The latter is first determined by solving semi-classical trajectories and by optimizing a chosen objective functional using a genetic algorithm. Then, the graded refractive index corresponding to the strain field is obtained by using its connection to the metric component in isothermal coordinates. These coordinates are evaluated via numerical quasiconformal transformations by solving the Beltrami equation with a finite volume method. The graphene surface deformation is finally optimized, also using a genetic algorithm, to reproduce the desired index of refraction. Some analytical results and numerical experiments are performed to illustrate the methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it