DR-PIFO: A Dynamic Ranking Packet Scheduler Using a Push-In-First-Out Queue
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Software-defined Networking (SDN) introduced the decoupling of control and data forwarding planes. Despite advances in the programmability of SDNs, there remains a strong need for a fully programmable packet scheduler in the data plane. In this context, the ability to adapt to various traffic patterns and the expressiveness of schedulers are of paramount importance. This paper introduces the Dynamic Ranking Push-In-First-Out (DR-PIFO), as an algorithmic model that can be used to develop programmable packet schedulers based on PIFO queues. The DR-PIFO is a highly expressive model, capable of expressing a wide range of work-conserving, non-work-conserving, and hierarchical scheduling algorithms. Additionally, its dynamic ranking capabilities allow for real-time updates to the packet’s priority within the scheduler. The proposed solution also performs error detection in the departure order of packets, which is essential to avoid starvation in strict priority scheduling. These features are crucial when implementing popular scheduling algorithms such as the pFabric. The DR-PIFO is evaluated through its algorithmic properties and by implementing two distinct case studies. Its performance is further evaluated by incorporating it as an external module, written in a high-level language, and integrating it with software switches implemented using the P4 language. The results illustrate the superior expressiveness of DR-PIFO over state-of-the-art models such as PIFO and PIEO and confirm that it is an algorithm-agnostic model. Thus, DR-PIFO represents a promising solution for implementing more fully programmable packet schedulers in SDNs, with the potential to improve performance and adaptability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it