MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LOW COMPLEXITY HEVC SCALABLE ENCODER BASED ON FSS ALGORITHM

2023· article· en· W4385820165 on OpenAlexaff
L. Balaji, A. Dhanalakshmi, Ch. Raja, K. K. Thyagharajan, Santhosh Krishna B V

Bibliographic record

VenueTelecommunications and Radio Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoderComputer scienceAlgorithmReference softwareScalabilityComputational complexity theoryCoding (social sciences)Scalable Video CodingAlgorithmic efficiencyReal-time computingMotion compensationSoftwareMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High efficiency video coding (HEVC) provides compressed video bit streams with good quality video that offers an extension of its kind-Scalable extension of high efficiency video coding (SHVC). SHVC offers delivery of compressed video bit streams over various types of networks with broader scalability. Mode decision and motion search in standard HEVC is more exhaustive and complex, and it is even more complex in the HEVC scalable extension. The encoder time increases due to the computational complexity in SHVC to find the best mode in the search algorithm. To overcome this, a forward-looking step search (FSS) algorithm is proposed to offer less computational complexity with acceptable coding efficiency. The FSS algorithm searches for the optimal matching block by fixing nine points around the assumed center point. The optimal block is determined by forward-looking each point that has minimal rate distortion cost (RDC). The simulation results show that the algorithm works better with a 0.5% increase in the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and an encoder time savings of 21.16% with the standard SHVC SHM software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTelecommunications and Radio EngineeringSame topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207