Post Implementation Issues of Goods and Services Tax in India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GST was declared as India's second intended attempt. But several months ago, on 1 July 2017, India as a country had made a big leaptowards a new order in its tax history which is undoubted, one of the important and revolutionary indirect fiscal reforms in Indian historysince independence. In addition, the post-GST era has so far seen the exporter numerous blows, errors, and incompatibility in archivedreturns as well as the World Bank calling GST a very complicated tax system. The GST Act prior to its implementation faced theresistance of state governments due to fear of loss of income for state governments. The current GST has certain problems in the system.In addition, there are only two countries apart from India, namely, Canada and Brazil have applied the dual GST model. In most othercountries of the world there is only one single tax system that is VAT or GST.The following study focuses on getting a meaningful idea about The challenges and prospects of post-GST application in India and thedifference between the Indian model of GST and similar taxes in other countries is the double GST Model. This study seeks to clarify theproblems of subsequent application of goods and services tax in India and how experience in GST raises a larger point, and maybe ithighlights a future lesson, about policy reforms. After two years in the time of the pandemic significantly after the closure, it has becomedifficult to manage for businessmen. Meanwhile, the government has been proactive in resolving the problems faced by Indian taxpayers.There are still gaps between the expectation and actual application of GST in terms of a simplified tax structure, ease of doing business,and overall price reduction.This study discusses the main problems of how goods and services tax affects the Indian economy and after the results are applied athorough understanding of GST in some other countries of the world. In addition, these issues have been raised during the postimplementationperiod, as well as critically analysing the expectation and the difference between their reality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".