MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385831069 · doi:10.1386/btwo_00083_7

Interview between Mark Turin, Lucy Barnes, Rupert Gatti and Alessandra Tosi

2023· article· en· W4385831069 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Turin, Alessandra Tosi, Rupert Gatti, Lucy Barnes

Bibliographic record

VenueBook 2 0 · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPublishing and Scholarly Communication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThrivingOutreachArtArt historyVisual artsSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This interview between the directors of Open Book Publishers (OBP), Alessandra Tosi and Rupert Gatti, editor and outreach coordinator, Lucy Barnes and board member, Mark Turin, explores the founding and development of OBP, a scholar-led, non-profit open access book publisher, and the obstacles it has overcome in its growth from a shared idea to a thriving, innovative press – as well as what the future holds for open access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBook 2 0Same topicPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationFrench-language works237,207