Bibliographic record
Abstract
He has published articles on questions relating to the educational integration of Montreal's Jewish community, and the financing and development of high school teaching in Quebec's public schools.His current research and publication deals with the development of public education, the emergence of liberal ideologies at the turn of the twentieth century in Quebec and Ontario and with the scholastic integration of immigrants in Montreal and Toronto.Jean-Philippe Croteau est professeur d'histoire à l'Université de Hearst en Ontario.On lui doit des articles sur les questions de l'intégration scolaire de la communauté juive à Montréal, du financement des écoles publiques et du développement de l'enseignement secondaire public au Québec.Ses travaux et ses recherches portent actuellement sur le développement de l'instruction publique, l'émergence des idéologies libérales au tournant du XX e siècle au Québec et en Ontario et sur l'intégration scolaire des immigrants à Montréal et à Toronto.Sharon Gubbay Helfer is a postdoctoral research fellow at the Université de Montréal, where she is working on an oral history of pioneers of interreligious and intercultural dialogue in Quebec.An oral historian with a doctorate in Jewish Studies from Concordia, her recent projects include a study of Ontario's small Jewish community for the Ontario Jewish Archives, a study of Montreal's Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue for Laval University's Projet d'inventaire du patrimoine immattériel religieux du Contributors/Collaborateurs 241
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.411 | 0.183 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".