La poésie trash de Charles Leblanc à l’épreuve de l’intersectionnalité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Franco-Manitobain Charles Leblanc, qui est à la fois poète, comédien et homme d’action, est un auteur prolifique, mais encore peu étudié. L’auteur affiche un parti pris marqué pour le peuple, pour les « déchets de la société » (Leblanc, 2008 : 30), comme en témoignent les sujets abordés crûment dans son oeuvre et son emploi d’une langue parfois vulgaire et injurieuse. Dans cet article, il sera plus particulièrement question de montrer en quoi la production poétique de Leblanc s’inscrit dans une esthétique trash qui tend vers l’intersectionnalité. Sera discutée dans cette étude l’anti-poésie de l’auteur qui, à l’instar de l’esthétique trash , exprime le refus sous différentes formes, qu’il s’agisse du refus de l’universel, de l’embellissement ou encore de la « grande » littérature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".