MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385846967 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.a904189

Prophets and Ghosts: The Story of Salvage Anthropology by Samuel J. Redman (review)

2023· article· en· W4385846967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousIdeologyAnthropologyHistoryArt historySociologyPolitical scienceBiologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Prophets and Ghosts: The Story of Salvage Anthropology by Samuel J. Redman Jaime M. N. Lavallee (bio) Prophets and Ghosts: The Story of Salvage Anthropology by Samuel J. Redman Harvard University Press, 2021 prophets and ghosts is a well-organized history of "salvage anthropology" defined as "the collecting and preservation of human culture deemed to be threatened. … not just collecting songs and stories but trying to document everything about a society and its heritage" (6). Redman acknowledges the challenges of an undertaking this large and that it is not a complete history—the breadth and depth would be more than this approximately three-hundred-page book could accommodate. Instead, he tackles the major players—institutions, government, and collectors—that shaped the course of salvage anthropology for the betterment (and for the not-so-betterment) of the field and the people that it studied. As a professor, I applaud the organization of the book and the chapters. Redman lays out the reasoning for each chapter, asking the reader to ponder questions within it. The inclusion of the impact of art by both Indigenous and non-Indigenous artists is a welcome connection to the ideologies of salvage anthropology, as well as the ways in which Indigenous Peoples connected to their own heritage and interactions with collectors (chapter 4). Chapter 5, "Cultural Salvage in California," achieves Redman's goal of showcasing a case study of salvage anthropology and its effects. The book unfolds history with a who's who of anthropology: individuals and their influences, as well as institutions. Often providing insight into personal motivations and sometimes cautiously speculating about what they might have been for the collector or institution—the juicy tidbits at times motivated me to read just a few more pages. The interwoven stories are illuminating as they bring the reader along for the ride throughout history, and they are also grounded in academically rigorous research. Prophets and Ghosts would be a suitable introduction for many, and any of the individual chapters would provide a good background of where salvage anthropology came from (chapters 1–5) and where it could go (chapter 6). Redman acknowledges that salvage anthropology is deeply embedded in colonialism. Settler colonialism created and perpetuated the "myth of the vanishing Indian." Salvage anthropologists sought out the "true" and "authentic Indian" bypassing adaptations (115–16) while simultaneously [End Page 114] reflecting modern Western society's views of "true and authentic" (123, 146–47) and valuable (157). These ideas continue to the present day; for example, within Canadian Aboriginal law, Indigenous Peoples must prove their Aboriginal rights only through connections to precontact practices and traditions; the original practice must not have a whiff of European influence or it is deemed non-Aboriginal and denied any present-day relevance. Thus, Indigenous Peoples are confined to precontact notions of hunting, fishing, and gathering; they are not seen as past and current economic actors who have always been capable of making a living from the resources around them. Redman does not tiptoe around the difficulties inherent in a field that was mostly exploitive, romanticized, and colonial. Collecting Indigenous Peoples' material culture was intended to "preserve" the sacred but not to allow its practice (82). The denial of Indigenous Peoples' basic human and civil rights is set within the historical context of nationalism, expansionism, and assimilationism. Without the government, museums, universities, and collectors removing Indigenous material culture (and thus the means of intergenerational transmission of knowledge), the goals of settler colonialism would not have been possible. Social evolution, which arose from Darwinism (24–25), aided in the creation and motivation behind salvage anthropology, and, ultimately, its professionalization into anthropology. Social evolution meant there was an inevitability and justification of the more civilized society (white) to dominate, eradicate, and assimilate the lesser civilized society (Indigenous). This played a major role in the race to collect, and thereby influenced what to keep and what was ascribed value as important knowledge and then later as art (31). Redman points out moments when salvage anthropologists and Indigenous Peoples collaborated. He has shown, where possible, the agency of Indigenous Peoples' cooperation to preserve their culture, such as the Omaha (67–70), as well as revitalization efforts...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.030
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it