MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385846967 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.a904189

Prophets and Ghosts: The Story of Salvage Anthropology by Samuel J. Redman (review)

2023· article· en· W4385846967 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousIdeologyAnthropologyHistoryArt historySociologyPolitical scienceBiologyLawPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Prophets and Ghosts: The Story of Salvage Anthropology by Samuel J. Redman Jaime M. N. Lavallee (bio) Prophets and Ghosts: The Story of Salvage Anthropology by Samuel J. Redman Harvard University Press, 2021 prophets and ghosts is a well-organized history of "salvage anthropology" defined as "the collecting and preservation of human culture deemed to be threatened. … not just collecting songs and stories but trying to document everything about a society and its heritage" (6). Redman acknowledges the challenges of an undertaking this large and that it is not a complete history—the breadth and depth would be more than this approximately three-hundred-page book could accommodate. Instead, he tackles the major players—institutions, government, and collectors—that shaped the course of salvage anthropology for the betterment (and for the not-so-betterment) of the field and the people that it studied. As a professor, I applaud the organization of the book and the chapters. Redman lays out the reasoning for each chapter, asking the reader to ponder questions within it. The inclusion of the impact of art by both Indigenous and non-Indigenous artists is a welcome connection to the ideologies of salvage anthropology, as well as the ways in which Indigenous Peoples connected to their own heritage and interactions with collectors (chapter 4). Chapter 5, "Cultural Salvage in California," achieves Redman's goal of showcasing a case study of salvage anthropology and its effects. The book unfolds history with a who's who of anthropology: individuals and their influences, as well as institutions. Often providing insight into personal motivations and sometimes cautiously speculating about what they might have been for the collector or institution—the juicy tidbits at times motivated me to read just a few more pages. The interwoven stories are illuminating as they bring the reader along for the ride throughout history, and they are also grounded in academically rigorous research. Prophets and Ghosts would be a suitable introduction for many, and any of the individual chapters would provide a good background of where salvage anthropology came from (chapters 1–5) and where it could go (chapter 6). Redman acknowledges that salvage anthropology is deeply embedded in colonialism. Settler colonialism created and perpetuated the "myth of the vanishing Indian." Salvage anthropologists sought out the "true" and "authentic Indian" bypassing adaptations (115–16) while simultaneously [End Page 114] reflecting modern Western society's views of "true and authentic" (123, 146–47) and valuable (157). These ideas continue to the present day; for example, within Canadian Aboriginal law, Indigenous Peoples must prove their Aboriginal rights only through connections to precontact practices and traditions; the original practice must not have a whiff of European influence or it is deemed non-Aboriginal and denied any present-day relevance. Thus, Indigenous Peoples are confined to precontact notions of hunting, fishing, and gathering; they are not seen as past and current economic actors who have always been capable of making a living from the resources around them. Redman does not tiptoe around the difficulties inherent in a field that was mostly exploitive, romanticized, and colonial. Collecting Indigenous Peoples' material culture was intended to "preserve" the sacred but not to allow its practice (82). The denial of Indigenous Peoples' basic human and civil rights is set within the historical context of nationalism, expansionism, and assimilationism. Without the government, museums, universities, and collectors removing Indigenous material culture (and thus the means of intergenerational transmission of knowledge), the goals of settler colonialism would not have been possible. Social evolution, which arose from Darwinism (24–25), aided in the creation and motivation behind salvage anthropology, and, ultimately, its professionalization into anthropology. Social evolution meant there was an inevitability and justification of the more civilized society (white) to dominate, eradicate, and assimilate the lesser civilized society (Indigenous). This played a major role in the race to collect, and thereby influenced what to keep and what was ascribed value as important knowledge and then later as art (31). Redman points out moments when salvage anthropologists and Indigenous Peoples collaborated. He has shown, where possible, the agency of Indigenous Peoples' cooperation to preserve their culture, such as the Omaha (67–70), as well as revitalization efforts...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,166
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,030
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,409
Écart entre enseignants0,360 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle