Age of Processing-Based Data Offloading for Autonomous Vehicles in Multi-RATs Open RAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Today, vehicles use smart sensors to collect data from the road environment. This data is often processed onboard of the vehicles, using expensive hardware. Such onboard processing increases the vehicle's cost, quickly drains its battery, and exhausts its computing resources. Therefore, offloading tasks onto the cloud is required. Still, data offloading is challenging due to low latency requirements for safe and reliable vehicle driving decisions. Moreover, age of processing was not considered in prior research dealing with low-latency offloading for autonomous vehicles. This paper proposes an age of processing-based offloading approach for autonomous vehicles using unsupervised machine learning, Multi-Radio Access Technologies (multi-RATs), and Edge Computing in Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN). We design a collaboration space of edge clouds to process data in proximity to autonomous vehicles. To reduce the variation in offloading delay, we propose a new communication planning approach that enables the vehicle to optimally preselect the available RATs such as Wi-Fi, LTE, or 5G to offload tasks to edge clouds when its local resources are insufficient. We formulate an optimization problem for age-based offloading that minimizes elapsed time from generating tasks and receiving computation output. To handle this non-convex problem, we develop a surrogate problem. Then, we use the Lagrangian method to transform the surrogate problem to unconstrained optimization problem and apply the dual decomposition method. The simulation results show that our approach significantly minimizes the age of processing in data offloading with 90.34 % improvement over similar method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".