SCALiR: a web application for automating absolute quantification of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Metabolomics is an important approach for studying complex biological systems. Quantitative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics is becoming a mainstream strategy but presents several technical challenges that limit its widespread use. Computing metabolite concentrations using standard curves generated from standard mixtures of known concentrations is a labor-intensive process which is often performed manually. Currently, there are few options for open-source software tools that can automatically calculate metabolite concentrations. Herein, we introduce SCALiR (Standard Curve Application for determining Linear Ranges), a new web-based software tool specifically built for this task, which allows users to automatically transform LC-MS signal data into absolute quantitative data ( https://www.lewisresearchgroup.org/software ). The algorithm used in SCALiR automatically finds the equation of the line of best fit for each standard curve and uses this equation to calculate compound concentrations from their LC-MS signal. Using a standard mix containing 77 metabolites, we found excellent correlation between the concentrations calculated by SCALiR and the expected concentrations of each compound (R 2 = 0.99) and that SCALiR reproducibly calculated concentrations of mid-range standards across ten analytical batches (average coefficient of variation 0.091). SCALiR offers users several advantages, including that it (1) is open-source and vendor agnostic; (2) requires only 10 seconds of analysis time to compute concentrations of >75 compounds; (3) facilitates automation of quantitative workflows; and (4) performs deterministic evaluation of compound quantification limits. SCALiR provides the metabolomics community with a simple and rapid tool that enables rigorous and reproducible quantitative metabolomics studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".