MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385863765 · doi:10.1109/tkde.2023.3303617

HSMH: A Hierarchical Sequence Multi-Hop Reasoning Model With Reinforcement Learning

2023· article· en· W4385863765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersState Key Laboratory of Integrated Services NetworksNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceInterpretabilityReinforcement learningReasoning systemInformation retrievalNatural language processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incompleteness of knowledge graphs (KGs) negatively impacts the performance of KGs in downstream applications (e.g., recommendation systems and information retrieval). This phenomenon has brought an increasing rise in research related to knowledge graph reasoning. Recently, emerged reinforcement learning (RL)-based multi-hop reasoning methods can infer missing information through multi-hop reasoning according to the existing information in KGs, which has better reasoning performance and interpretability. However, these methods always use relation-entity pairs that have been pre-cropped as the action space of agents for path reasoning, which leads to two problems: 1) insufficient learning and reasoning ability of reasoning models and 2) the hard convergence of the training process of agents. To address these problems, we propose a <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">H</b> ierarchical <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">S</b> equence <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">M</b> ulti <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">H</b> op (HSMH) reasoning framework, which consists of the interactive search reasoning model, local-global knowledge fusion mechanism, and action optimization mechanism. We use interactive search reasoning models to select relations and entities independently, thus fully mining the semantic information of relations and entities and improving the learning and reasoning ability of reasoning models. In the HSMH framework, we design the local-global knowledge fusion and action optimization mechanisms for path reasoning, which can enhance agents' state information and action space. Specifically, the local-global knowledge fusion mechanism is designed to acquire the local knowledge of entities and neighboring relations and the global knowledge about KG structure. This local-global knowledge can improve the learning ability of reasoning models. In addition, the action optimization mechanism can combine the filtered action space and the additional action space for efficient path reasoning for agents. Experimental results on five benchmark datasets show that our proposed HSMH framework comprehensively outperforms the state-of-the-art multi-hop reasoning model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it