MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385866170 · doi:10.59962/9780774852142-001

Preface

2007· book-chapter· en· W4385866170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When I began to canvass ideas and problems associated with Aboriginal self-government, a title for this book quickly came to mind.It was not the one that appears on the cover.I borrowed the original title from something once said by an American president, and I adjusted the quotation, familiar to many, to fit the context of Aboriginal self-government.Although the title was somewhat clinical, I believed that it reflected the messages contained here.For a long time, it remained the ostensible title for this book.Then, in the spring of 1998, I attended a play put on by the Young People's Theatre of Toronto, The Jumping Mouse, a story attributed to the Plains Cree.It recounts how a field mouse discovers the legend of the far-off mountains and dreams that her future is to be found there.She undertakes a journey to the mountains with another mouse who, lacking sufficient courage to continue, turns back before their goal is reached.But Jumping Mouse perseveres.Along the way, she is asked to contribute each of her eyes for the benefit of another.Initially, she hesitates but then believes somehow this is the right thing to do.So she obliges.Finally, after much effort to overcome her fears along the way, she reaches the mountains and discovers the content of her dream.She realizes the truth about herself and is then miraculously transformed into an eagle, gaining all the knowledge and wisdom that an eagle possesses.Upon leaving the theatre, I realized that the title of this book must be A People's Dream: Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada.Like Jumping Mouse, Aboriginal people have a dream, one with many facets.It includes recognition of and respect for treaties.It involves the return of lands that were once theirs as well as the recognition of their right to use these lands in whatever ways they choose.These may include not only traditional methods of harvesting such as hunting, fishing, and trapping but also conventional methods of resource utilization such as mining, forestry, and gaming.This Aboriginal dream also envisions respect for Aboriginal nations as first peoples of this land and anticipates nation-to-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5450.365

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→