MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385873659 · doi:10.55274/r0012054

DTPH56-13-T-000003 INO Technologies Assessment of Leak Detection

2015· report· en· W4385873659 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah Jelen, Jean-François Gravel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeak detectionLeakPipeline transportPipeline (software)Computer scienceEngineeringComputer securityOperating systemMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current leak detection systems for pipelines are not only unreliable in the detection of minute leaks but often expensive and/or dangerous to run. This is an unacceptable standard for pipeline operators and leak detection service providers. Electricore, Inc., and INO with support from TransCanada and National Scientific Research Institute (INRS/RDDC) conducted a new research effort consisting of the development of a transportable leak detection system (LDS) demonstrating the ability to externally locate, identify, and assess small liquid and gaseous leaks (weeper/seepers) from a safe standoff distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207