MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385873659 · doi:10.55274/r0012054

DTPH56-13-T-000003 INO Technologies Assessment of Leak Detection

2015· report· en· W4385873659 on OpenAlexaff
Deborah Jelen, Jean-François Gravel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeak detectionLeakPipeline transportPipeline (software)Computer scienceEngineeringComputer securityOperating systemMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current leak detection systems for pipelines are not only unreliable in the detection of minute leaks but often expensive and/or dangerous to run. This is an unacceptable standard for pipeline operators and leak detection service providers. Electricore, Inc., and INO with support from TransCanada and National Scientific Research Institute (INRS/RDDC) conducted a new research effort consisting of the development of a transportable leak detection system (LDS) demonstrating the ability to externally locate, identify, and assess small liquid and gaseous leaks (weeper/seepers) from a safe standoff distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1830.117

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207