MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385875459 · doi:10.24908/ijesjp.v10i1.16697

Diálogos

2023· article· es· W4385875459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvertising and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La creación de narrativas visuales en el marco de Ingeniería, Tecnología y Ciencia responde a una serie de relatos que nacieron de imaginarios utópicos de otros mundos posibles. Enfatizando principalmente en la construcción de ecosistemas que integrarán elementos visuales e identitarios Colombianos, las ilustraciones puntualizaron en comunicar las muchas posibilidades de la tecnología en dialogo con la cotidianidad de las sociedades, que más allá de ser un campo que se explora desde la academia, instituciones, etc.; es una dimensión netamente social, en la que convergen maneras de ser y hacer, legitimando desde visiones subalternas su uso y apropiación. Por lo tanto, la ilustración brinda el espacio en un lienzo digital para capturar esos principios, resignificar y alentar nuevas perspectivas de acción y protagonismo en la ingeniería y tecnología.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it