MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385875591 · doi:10.5539/ells.v13n3p41

An Analysis of Paul’s Search for Self in Sons and Lovers

2023· article· en· W4385875591 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhong Yu, Tianming Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language and Literature Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmancipationIndependence (probability theory)PsychoanalysisOedipus complexPsychologySociologyArtLawPolitical scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sons and Lovers is one of the most famous novels of D.H. Lawrence. This novel centers around the predicament of the protagonist Paul during his growth and mental changes resulting from it. During Paul’s growth, his strong dependency on his mother produces the twisted Oedipus complex, which eventually leads to his loss of self. This article analyzes Paul’s growth through the psychological concept of Oedipus Complex, pointing out the fact that father’s absence and the intensive Oedipus complex during his childhood contribute to Paul’s loss of self. Although Paul is under the influence of Oedipus complex, he still makes attempts to get rid of his mother’s influence, and thus achieve self-emancipation and true independence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language and Literature StudiesSame topicModernist Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207