MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385875678 · doi:10.24908/ijesjp.v10i1.16068

Autonomía y comunidad: horizonte político de la apropiación tecnológica

2023· article· es· W4385875678 on OpenAlex
Leonardo Miguel Barraza Aranda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience, Technology, and Education in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el campo de los Estudios de Ciencia y Tecnología el objetivo político de la apropiación tecnológica se asocia con la democratización de los procesos de diseño y desarrollo tecnológico, a través de procesos deliberativos. En el presente articulo se lleva a cabo una crítica a dicho horizonte a través de una argumentación filosófica que busca plantear alternativas a dicho horizonte en el contexto latinoamericano. El articulo explora las nociones de democracia radical, autonomía y comunidad dentro del horizonte comunitario-popular como formas alternativas de entender la dimensión política de la apropiación tecnológica. El articulo argumenta que esta alternativa política desplaza la apropiación tecnológica hacia un ámbito colectivo y hacia practicas reproductivas de lo viviente. El articulo concluye con algunos ejemplos de dicho horizonte, dados dentro de los espacios alternativos de tecnología que han surgido en las últimas décadas en la región.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it