MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385878138 · doi:10.4324/9781003200871-25

Mental images and emotive voices in true crime podcasts focused on female victims

2023· book-chapter· en· W4385878138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer O’Meara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmotivePsychologyCriminologySociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid rise in true crime podcasts is a notable trend accompanying the widespread expansion of podcasting in the twenty-first century. Critics and scholars of true crime podcasts are particularly interested in reconciling the predominantly female listenership of these podcasts with content that often focuses on female victims. This chapter considers the presentation of murdered or missing women in a range of podcast series, with reference to questions of voice and the ways in which, even in an audio medium, stories of violence against women can be sensationalist and emotive forms of infotainment. I argue that forms of affective response – of being overwhelmed, of feeling affection for victims – may help to explain the appeal of such true crime podcasts to women. The podcasts chosen for discussion provide a range of production contexts and approaches to their presentation of female victims’ stories, including the American viral sensation Serial (2014), the Audible podcast West Cork (2018), which is set in Ireland and focuses on the unsolved murder of Frenchwoman Sophie Toscan du Plantier, and Missing and Murdered: Finding Cleo (2018), which was produced by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and explores the disappearance of a young Indigenous girl. After first considering how mental images of victims’ bodies are presented verbally, I examine aspects of the use of the voice in true crime podcasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital MediaFrench-language works237,207