MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385878622 · doi:10.3897/zookeys.1175.105068

A revision of the parasitoid wasp genus Alphomelon Mason with the description of 30 new species (Hymenoptera, Braconidae)

2023· article· en· W4385878622 on OpenAlexaffabout
José Fernández-Triana, Eduardo Mitio Shimbori, James B. Whitfield, Angélica Maria Penteado‐Dias, Scott Richard Shaw, Caroline Boudreault, Jayme E Sones, Kate Perez, Allison Brown, Ramya Manjunath, John M. Burns, Paul D. N. Hebert, M. Alex Smith, Winnifred Hallwachs, Daniel H. Janzen

Bibliographic record

VenueZooKeys · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBraconidaeBiologyDNA barcodingParasitoid waspParasitoidHymenopteraGenusKey (lock)Lepidoptera genitaliaZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The parasitoid wasp genusAlphomelonMason, 1981 is revised, based on a combination of basic morphology (dichotomous key and brief diagnostic descriptions), DNA barcoding, biology (host data and wasp cocoons), and distribution data. A total of 49 species is considered; the genus is almost entirely Neotropical (48 species recorded from that region), but three species reach the Nearctic, with one of them extending as far north as 45° N in Canada.Alphomelonparasitizes exclusively Hesperiinae caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), mostly feeding on monocots in the families Arecaceae, Bromeliaceae, Cannaceae, Commelinaceae, Heliconiaceae, and Poaceae. Most wasp species parasitize either on one or very few (2–4) host species, usually within one or two hesperiine genera; but some species can parasitize several hosts from up to nine different hesperiine genera. Among species with available data for their cocoons, roughly half weave solitary cocoons (16) and half are gregarious (17); cocoons tend to be surrounded by a rather distinctive, coarse silk (especially in solitary species, but also distinguishable in some gregarious species). Neither morphology nor DNA barcoding alone was sufficient on its own to delimit all species properly; by integrating all available evidence (even if incomplete, as available data for every species is different) a foundation is provided for future studies incorporating more specimens, especially from South America. The following 30new speciesare described:cruzi,itatiaiensis, andpalomae, authored by Shimbori & Fernandez-Triana; andadrianguadamuzi,amazonas,andydeansi,calixtomoragai,carolinacanoae,christerhanssoni,diniamartinezae,duvalierbricenoi,eldaarayae,eliethcantillanoae,gloriasihezarae,guillermopereirai,hazelcambroneroae,josecortesi,keineraragoni,luciarosae,manuelriosi,mikesharkeyi,osvaldoespinozai,paramelanoscelis,paranigriceps,petronariosae,ricardocaleroi,rigoi,rostermoragai,sergioriosi, andyanayacu, authored by Fernandez-Triana & Shimbori.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZooKeysSame topicHymenoptera taxonomy and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207