MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385891797 · doi:10.24908/ijesjp.v10i1.16248

Geometría, robots, y sociedad.

2023· article· es· W4385891797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Federico Ardila–Mantilla

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muchos llegamos a la ciencia desde la curiosidad, en búsqueda del entendimiento y de la belleza. Con el tiempo descubrimos que la ciencia es una herramienta tremendamente poderosa. El posible éxito y aplicabilidad de nuestro proyecto científico nos enfrentan a preguntas éticas que no podemos ignorar. En una sociedad profundamente desigual, ¿quién tiene acceso a las tec- nologías que puedan resultar? ¿Quién se beneficia y quién se perjudica? ¿Cuál es nuestra responsabilidad como científicxs e ingenierxs? ¿Qué papel jugamos en la construcción de una sociedad más justa y equitativa? Esta es la reflexión de un investigador cuyo trabajo en matema ́tica “pura” encontró aplicaciones inesperadas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Engineering Social Justice and PeaceSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207