Design of a Parallel Resonance Based Frequency-Selective Rasorber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we propose a rasorber in the Ka-band as a means of reducing the radar cross section (RCS) and compare its characteristics and performance with those of state-of-the-art studies. A rasorber is a combination of a radome and an absorber. It implements the radome function while absorbing external electromagnetic waves. Frequency-dependent frequency-selective rasorber (FSR) is the most commonly used type of rasorber. An FSR, comprising lossy and lossless resonators, is designed in this study to have an electromagnetic transmission characteristic at 35 GHz through a parallel LC tank circuit. The lossy resonator located in front of the losselss resonator exhibits a broadband electromagnetic absorption characteristic due to an additional series RLC circuit. The center frequency of the transmission band is tuned by adjusting the resonant frequency of the LC tank circuit. Additionally, the proposed FSR is designed with a transmission band located at the end of the absorption band. It has a transmission frequency of 35 GHz with an absorption rate of 80 % or more at 7.8∼28.5 GHz including the X, Ku, and K-bands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".