Haralick texture analysis for microdosimetry: characterization of Monte Carlo generated 3D specific energy distributions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Explore the application of Haralick textural analysis to 3D distributions of specific energy (energy imparted per unit mass) scored in cell-scale targets considering varying mean specific energy (absorbed dose), target volume, and incident spectrum. Approach. Monte Carlo simulations are used to generate specific energy distributions in cell-scale water voxels ((1 μ m) 3 –(15 μ m) 3 ) irradiated by photon sources (mean energies: 0.02–2 MeV) to varying mean specific energies (10–400 mGy). Five Haralick features (homogeneity, contrast, entropy, correlation, local homogeneity) are calculated using an implementation of Haralick analysis designed to reduce sensitivity to grey level quantization and are interpreted using fundamental radiation physics. Main results. Haralick measures quantify differences in 3D specific energy distributions observed with varying voxel volume, absorbed dose magnitude, and source spectrum. For example, specific energy distributions in small (1–3 μ m) voxels with low magnitudes of absorbed dose (10 mGy) have relatively high measures of homogeneity and local homogeneity and relatively low measures of contrast and entropy (all relative to measures for larger voxels), reflecting the many voxels with zero specific energy in an otherwise sporadic distribution. With increasing target size, energy is shared across more target voxels, and trends in Haralick measures, such as decreasing homogeneity and increasing contrast and entropy, reflect characteristics of each 3D specific energy distribution. Specific energy distributions for sources of differing mean energy are characterized by Haralick measures, e.g. contrast generally decreases with increasing source energy, correlation and homogeneity are often (not always) higher for higher energy sources. Significance. Haralick texture analysis successfully quantifies spatial trends in 3D specific energy distributions characteristic of radiation source, target size, and absorbed dose magnitude, thus offering new avenues to quantify microdosimetric data beyond first order histogram features. Promising future directions include investigations of multiscale tissue models, targeted radiation therapy techniques, and biological response to radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".