MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385932465 · doi:10.32920/23979270.v1

Make Me A Vessel: A Craft Based Exploration of Feminized Labour and Sustainability

2023· preprint· en· W4385932465 on OpenAlexaff
Madison Schmidt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCraftRealmSustainabilityFeminization (sociology)FemininityPower (physics)SociologyAestheticsGender studiesPolitical scienceArtLawVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This practice-led research study addresses the feminized body to unravel the oftentimes overlooked designation of sustainability as a feminine responsibility that positions the feminized body a vessel for the labour of load bearing. Through a series of creative craft explorations that places vessels (or bags) in dialogue with the feminine body, this work questions the feminization of labour and load bearing. It attempts to understand the relation between the feminine body, sustainability and the overarching patriarchal power structure which relegates them to the margins. Illuminating historically enforced gender binaries that shape mobility, exposing patriarchal power structures that are embedded in the act of carrying, and problematizing the designation of sustainability as a feminine responsibility as it is viewed a natural extension of femininity or domesticity, illuminates the issue of the relegation of corporate or institutional responsibility for sustainability to a private feminized realm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.038
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCrafts, Textile, and DesignFrench-language works237,207