A Becoming Creative Process: Études on Experimental Fragmentation and Reconstruction in Fashion Design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The Major Research Project (MRP) employs a conceptual framework composed of fifteen (15) experimental “Études” exploring concepts of fragmentation and reconstruction in fashion design. Using becoming-theory and unbecoming-theory as a lens, it intends to open a dialogue on gender, the body, and sustainability. This MRP undertakes an exploration of the complexities within the particular forms of oppression experienced by women. Furthermore, this creative research offers analytic reflections on patriarchy through deconstruction of uniforms. This project explores the limits of fashion, art, and critical theory. In doing so, it aims to blur the boundaries between femininity and masculinity. With a focus on process-as-knowing, this MRP reveals how interdisciplinary practice-led methodology can influence and give agency to one’s embodied creative practice. By making “becoming” experimental accessories and garments, the autoethnography of documentation methods will act as a vessel to support and contain the creative process as interpreted through intuition.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".