MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385932777 · doi:10.32920/23979069.v1

Video Artists: Creating a Living Legacy

2023· preprint· en· W4385932777 on OpenAlexaff
Cole Anderson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmateurWork (physics)Visual artsEstateArtMultimediaSociologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceEngineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis outlines best practices for video artists to document their careers and achievements, while organizing and preserving their life’s work so that it remains accessible long after their death. In it, I provide guidelines for video artists, whether amateur or established, to document their careers and achievements. I will address issues specific to the preservation needs of videotape and digital media, and offer guidance to video artists on how to prepare their estate. While thinking about death is difficult for anyone, artists can ensure that their work and creative legacy endures by following the advice offered here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→