Hierarchical Independent Coding Scheme for Varifocal Multiview Images Based on Angular-Focal Joint Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Varifocal multiview (VFMV) images are dense views that focus on variable focal planes. Thus, VFMV images are highly redundant in the angular, spatial and focal dimensions. In this article, the redundancies of VFMV images are analyzed and represented by full parallaxes and focal inconsistency. To exploit these distinctive redundancies, we propose a hierarchical independent coding scheme based on angular-focal joint prediction. The scheme is constructed by hierarchical independent prediction structure (HIPS) and angular-focal joint prediction (AFJP). The HIPS separates all views into several independent subdivisions and assigns different hierarchies inside each subdivision, which enhances random access capability and scalability. The AFJP conducts motion estimation and focal approximation simultaneously to predict parallaxes and focal inconsistency. Therefore, the redundancies in the angular and focal dimensions can be exploited by the proposed coding scheme. We construct a VFMV dataset with 10 test sequences for different acquisition methods. The experimental results on these test sequences demonstrate that the proposed scheme outperforms all comparison schemes in objective quality, subjective quality and random access capability. Specifically, the proposed coding scheme achieves up to 2.661 dB PSNR gains and 52.817% bitrate savings compared with the HEVC random access benchmark scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".