A Case Report of the Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorder with Transference Focused Psychotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) is an evidence-based, psychodynamic psychotherapy empirically validated for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and successfully adapted for the treatment of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD). Personality disorders are characterized by the behavioral and affective dysregulation associated with pathological identity formation. Based on contemporary object relations theory (ORT), the goal of TFP is symptom relief through improvement in self and interpersonal functioning. The TFP treatment frame, established through an initial contracting phase and combined with the therapist’s technical neutrality, facilitates activation, identification and containment of affectively charged perceptions of self and other. These perceptions, or object relations dyads, are repeatedly identified, labeled and explored through the interpretative process. Over the course of treatment, the patient’s capacity for affect containment and reflection improves and a better integrated, realistic sense of self develops consistent with healthier personality functioning. Utilizing a compilation of several patients, the treatment of NPD with TPF is described and the evidence for the efficacy of TFP for NPD is summarized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.013 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".