Presse gaie, littérature et reconnaissance homosexuelle au tournant des années 1980 en France et au Québec : Gai Pied, Masques, les éditions Persona et Le Berdache
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, les auteurs proposent une analyse de la place qu’a occupée au tournant des années 1980 la littérature gaie dans la presse gaie française et québécoise (Gai Pied, Masques, Le Berdache), ainsi que dans le catalogue de la maison d’édition Persona. Après un portrait quantitatif du corpus, ils se penchent sur les sources proprement dites et montrent que la littérature renvoie à des préoccupations bien précises : revendication de l’homosexualité au sein de l’espace public, affirmation de modes de vie, construction d’une mémoire, d’un passé historique et littéraire gai, interrogation sur la question pédophile. Leur contribution se conclut par une réflexion sur la notion même de littérature gaie, fort problématique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".