MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385964184 · doi:10.1080/00083968.2023.2198246

Les Jeux des îles de l’océan Indien au prisme de la globalisation sportive (1979–2023)

2023· article· fr· W4385964184 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Louis Violette, Olivier Naria, J. Fuchs

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesGlobalizationArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fondés en 1979 à l’initiative du Comité régional olympique et sportif de La Réunion, les Jeux des îles de l’océan Indien (JIOI) s’installent dans les décennies suivantes dans la myriade des “jeux régionaux.” Réplique micro-scalaire des Jeux olympiques, ils sont impactés par le phénomène de globalisation à l’échelle mondiale – quand bien même ils se veulent avant tout vitrine sportive de l’espace indianocéanique. À ce titre, les JIOI sont gagnés par un processus d’homogénéisation au regard des standards sportifs internationaux. Toutefois, persiste une forme de polarisation eu égard à ce référentiel normatif, liée à des paramètres locaux en termes politiques, sociaux, économiques ou encore territoriaux. À travers le paradigme de l’identité culturelle et certaines opportunités relatives à la coopération régionale, les JIOI sont également marqués par un processus d’hybridation ascendant. En somme, ils sont un exemple heuristique des variations et ambivalences de la globalisation du sport au tournant des XXe et XXIe siècles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africainesSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207