MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385967090 · doi:10.1190/int-2023-0009.1

A machine-learning workflow to integrate high-resolution core-based facies into basin-scale stratigraphic models for the Wolfcamp and Third Bone Spring Sand, Delaware Basin

2023· article· en· W4385967090 on OpenAlex
T. E. Larson, J. Evan Sivil, Priyanka Periwal, Jesse Melick

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterpretation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaciesGeologyPetrologySedimentary depositional environmentReservoir modelingWell loggingStructural basinGeomorphologyGeophysicsPetroleum engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The characterization of subsurface reservoirs that are dominated by mudrock facies is hindered by the inherent heterogeneity and high degree of spatial variability typical of mudrock depositional systems. Subsurface reservoir properties that include porosity and permeability, fluid saturations, stratigraphic thicknesses of reservoir units, and source rock potential are ultimately controlled by the spatial distribution of sedimentary rock facies, which supports efforts to improve subsurface characterization workflows. Although core-based data provide direct measurements of rock attributes that are used to inform static reservoir models, capturing high-resolution core-based rock facies and downscaling these observations to tie to lower-resolution wireline logs remains a challenge. The effort to integrate core-based facies to reservoir-scale models is especially difficult when trying to capture thin-bedded heterogeneity that is common to mudrock systems. Herein, a workflow is developed and applied to visualize and integrate multivariate and spatially complex core-based data sets with wireline logs. Formation-specific core-based chemofacies training data sets are developed by integrating core descriptions with chemofacies clusters developed from high-resolution X-ray fluorescence core scanning. Core-based rock attribute data (e.g., XRD mineralogy, total porosity, and total organic matter content) are used to describe the chemofacies, providing a means to upscale low-resolution rock attribute measurements to high-resolution core-based chemofacies. Supervised core-based chemofacies training data sets are then used with neural network multiclass classification machine-learning tools to train triple combo wireline logs (gamma ray, deep resistivity, bulk density, and neutron porosity) to predict rock facies from wireline logs, providing a new approach to apply core-based facies classifications to wireline log studies. A basin-scale case study that applies this workflow is described for the Third Bone Spring Sand and units of the Wolfcamp Formation in the Delaware Basin of West Texas, United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it