Improving the Data Quality of Untargeted Metabolomics through a Targeted Data-Dependent Acquisition Based on an Inclusion List of Differential and Preidentified Ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metabolomics based on high-resolution mass spectrometry has become a powerful technique in biomedical research. The development of various analytical tools and online libraries has promoted the identification of biomarkers. However, how to make mass spectrometry collect more data information is an important but underestimated research topic. Herein, we combined full-scan and data-dependent acquisition (DDA) modes to develop a new targeted DDA based on the inclusion list of differential and preidentified ions (dpDDA). In this workflow, the MS 1 datasets for statistical analysis and metabolite preidentification were first obtained using full-scan, and then, the MS/MS datasets for metabolite identification were obtained using targeted DDA of quality control samples based on the inclusion list. Compared with the current methods (DDA, data-independent acquisition, targeted DDA with time-staggered precursor ion list, and iterative exclusion DDA), dpDDA showed better stability, higher characteristic ion coverage, higher differential metabolites’ MS/MS coverage, and higher quality MS/MS spectra. Moreover, the same trend was verified in the analysis of large-scale clinical samples. More surprisingly, dpDDA can distinguish patients with different severities of coronary heart disease (CHD) based on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification, which we cannot distinguish through conventional metabolomics data collection. Finally, dpDDA was employed to differentiate CHD from healthy control, and targeted metabolomics confirmed that dpDDA could identify a more complete metabolic pathway network. At the same time, four unreported potential CHD biomarkers were identified, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was greater than 0.85. These results showed that dpDDA would expand the discovery of biomarkers based on metabolomics, more comprehensively explore the key metabolites and their association with diseases, and promote the development of precision medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".