MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

World War Two and San Francisco

2023· book-chapter· en· W4385971781 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Gorman

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlueprintWorld War IISovereigntyPolitical scienceInternational relationsEconomic historyHistoryLawEngineeringPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter examines the Second World War (WWII) and the creation of the United Nations (UN) at the San Francisco Conference in 1945 as key moments where the modernist concepts of territorial sovereignty and a shared awareness of global challenges converged. The chapter surveys the different but overlapping ways in which international historians and International Relations (IR) scholars understand WWII and the creation of the UN as global moments. It demonstrates that the war years were a period of seismic international transformation that mobilized global actors to establish new patterns of international engagement, some of which incorporated aspects of the pre-war system. It analyses the San Francisco Conference as a signal moment of closure and creation, both a peace settlement and a blueprint for an emergent multilateral international system. Finally, the chapter identifies legacies of WWII and the San Francisco Conference in International History and IR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207