MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385971925 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3128530/v1

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency therapy of stellate ganglion on refractory painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

2023· preprint· en· W4385971925 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. H. Wang, Peng Yang, Hong‐Li Zheng, weisheng xu, wangsheng xue, Y. Kan, Shen Qu, Fuqing Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVisual analogue scaleMcGill Pain QuestionnaireRefractory (planetary science)Quality of life (healthcare)Neuropathic painPulsed radiofrequencyPeripheral neuropathyAnesthesiaSurgeryPain reliefDiabetes mellitusNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The best tool for management of pain associated with distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy(DSPN) is a matter of debate. The use of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) therapy of stellate ganglion (SG) in patients with painful DSPN may decrease pain severity and the need for analgesics. Methods: Patients: We enrolled 56 patients with T2DM and refractory painful DSPN in this study. Intervention: The patients received bilateral ultrasound-guided SG pulsed radiofrequency therapies once on both sides. Measurement: The patients completed the visual analog scale (VAS), simplified McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), pain index, Toronto clinical score system (TCSS), sleep duration at night (SDN), pain disability index (PDI), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), depression screening scale (PHQ-9), and anxiety screening scale (GAD-7) to assess severity and quality of pain. After completing the procedures,the patient’s subjective sensations, including the degree of perceived pain relief, level of perceived numbness relief, extent of perceived chills relief, and side effects were assessed. All patients underwent baseline evaluation after the last procedure at 1-week, 4-week, 12-week, and 24-week follow-up periods. Results: The postoperative VAS were significantly lower than the preoperative VAS scores (P<0.001). The SF-MPQ score at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly lower than the preoperative SF-MPQ score (P<0.001). The KPS after the procedures was significantly higher than the preoperative KPS (P<0.001); the postoperative PDI was significantly lower than the preoperative PDI (P<0.001). The postoperative SDN (P=0.005) was longer than the preoperative SDN. The postoperative PHQ-9 score was lower than the preoperative score PHQ-9 (P<0.05). The degree of perceived pain relief, chills relief, and numbness relief at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure were lower than that at 1 week after the procedures (P<0.001). The postoperative rates of administration of oral anticonvulsants and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were lower than those of preoperative period (P<0.001). The significant effective rates at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after procedure, were 67.86%, 42.86%, 21.43%, and 17.86%, respectively and the total effective rates were 89.29%,71.43%, 46.43%, and 32.14%, respectively, with a decreasing trend at all follow-up periods. No serious complication was observed. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion PRF therapy can effectively relieve pain and improve the quality of life in patients with refractory painful DSPN. International Review Board Number: ChiCTR2000035544 Clinical Trial registration Number: SHSY-IEC-4.1/21-48/01

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207