MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385973614 · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.008

Predictors of Psychosocial and Functional Outcomes in Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder/Genito-Pelvic Dysesthesia: Application of the Fear-Avoidance Model

2023· article· en· W4385973614 on OpenAlexafffund
Robyn A. Jackowich, Évéline Poirier, Caroline F. Pukall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pain · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDysesthesiaArousalPsychosocialMedicineClinical psychologySex organPsychiatryPsychologyAnesthesiaNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder/Genito-Pelvic Dysesthesia (PGAD/GPD), which affects up to 4.3% of individuals, is a distressing and poorly understood condition characterized by persistent, unwanted, and often painful sensations of genito-pelvic arousal (eg, throbbing) in the absence of sexual desire. PGAD/GPD is associated with significant negative impacts on psychosocial well-being and daily functioning. Recent research has indicated that PGAD/GPD shares many similarities with other forms of chronic genito-pelvic pain. This study applied the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain to PGAD/GPD to identify cognitive and behavioral factors associated with psychosocial and functional outcomes. A total of 263 individuals with PGAD/GPD symptoms completed a cross-sectional online survey of symptom intensity, cognitive and behavioral predictors (symptom catastrophizing, hypervigilance to symptoms, symptom fear and avoidance, self-efficacy), depression symptoms, and role functioning. Symptom catastrophizing, fear of symptoms, avoidance of symptoms, and hypervigilance to PGAD/GPD symptoms were significantly correlated with poorer psychosocial and functional outcomes, whereas higher self-efficacy was significantly associated with lower depression and better role functioning. Two serial parallel mediation models examined the fear-avoidance pathway from PGAD/GPD symptom intensity to depression symptoms and role functioning. In both models, the pathway through symptom catastrophizing, fear of symptoms, and symptom avoidance was significant, but the pathway through symptom catastrophizing, fear of symptoms, and symptom hypervigilance was not. The results of this study provide support for the applicability of the fear-avoidance model to PGAD/GPD. Interventions targeting fear-avoidance factors may help to reduce PGAD/GPD symptom intensity, distress, and increase psychological well-being and daily functioning. PERSPECTIVE: This article provides support for the applicability of the fear-avoidance model of chronic pain to Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder/Genito-Pelvic Dysesthesia (PGAD/GPD). These results suggest that interventions targeting fear-avoidance cognitions and behaviors (catastrophizing, fear, avoidance, hypervigilance) may help to reduce PGAD/GPD symptom intensity and improve psychological well-being and daily functioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PainSame topicPelvic floor disorders treatmentsFrench-language works237,207