MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385976117 · doi:10.5267/j.uscm.2023.6.019

The factors affecting digital transformation in small and medium enterprises in Hanoi city

2023· article· en· W4385976117 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thanh Tung Hoang, Vũ Thị Kim Dung, T. Hung Lam, Hoai Nam Pham

Bibliographic record

VenueUncertain Supply Chain Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTechnology acceptance modelDigital transformationUsabilityBusinessTheory of reasoned actionTheory of planned behaviorAffect (linguistics)Transformation (genetics)Small and medium-sized enterprisesMarketingControl (management)Knowledge managementComputer sciencePsychologySocial psychologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluates the factors affecting digital transformation for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Hanoi city. The research team determined the factors affecting digital transformation for small and medium enterprises based on some models such as the Theory of reasoned action (TRA), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theoretical of planned behavior (TPB), C-TAM-TPB model and Unified Model of Technology Adoption and Use. The research results identify the model of factors that affect the argument transformation SMEs in Hanoi city, including (1) Perceived usability; (2) Perceived behavioral control; (3) Social influence; (4) Expected efficiency, (5) Convenient conditions and (6) Risks existing in digital transformation. The results also show that there are 6 factors affecting the implementation of the credit union of SMEs in Hanoi city, of which 5 factors have positive effects and 1 factor has negative effects. In addition, the results also show that there are certain differences in the intentions and decisions of digital transformation between different types of enterprises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUncertain Supply Chain ManagementSame topicDigitalization and Economic Development in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207