MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385981329 · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202341506002

Log Crib Check Dam Performance under Multiple Debris-Flow Loadings – East Gate Landslide, British Columbia, Canada

2023· article· en· W4385981329 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matthias Busslinger, Matthias Jakob, Richard J Singer, Ryan S. D. Calder

Bibliographic record

VenueE3S Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsParks CanadaBGC Engineering (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThalwegLandslideDebris flowDebrisGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Check dams are used in gullies to prevent vertical downcutting of the thalweg. Check dams built as log crib structures are common in steep creeks prone to floods or debris floods. Recent experience with performance of log crib check dams subject to debris flow loadings is less common, as those check dams are often made from reinforced concrete, steel or masonry. This paper summarizes our experience with six log crib check dams built in a gully at East Gate Landslide, between Revelstoke and Golden, BC, Canada. The log crib check dams are subjected to multiple debris flow events every year. The project started as a pilot study and the design is adjusted before the next construction season, based on performance experience with previously built structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueE3S Web of ConferencesSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207