Intelligent Characterization of Spark-Assisted Chemical Engraving (SACE) Process Using Time Series Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Spark-Assisted Chemical Engraving (SACE) requires precise control over key factors to overcome gas film instability and achieve reproducible optimal resolution and machining speed. This paper presents a substantial advancement in the SACE micromanufacturing technique by introducing a composite algorithm. This algorithm leverages deep learning and time series classification, employing a Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture for sequence-to-sequence intelligent classification. These classifiers are trained and optimized using Bayesian optimization, achieving impressive accuracies of 97.12% for TCN and 96.64% for LSTM. The algorithm utilizes TCN's superior performance to calculate derived parameters like gas film formation time, lifetime, mean discharge current and energy, and discharging frequency. Its versatility is demonstrated across various experimental conditions, showcasing its potential for rapid and accurate systematic studies. By highlighting the algorithm's applicability in real-time process control for SACE, this study establishes a foundation for future advancements in the field of glass micro manufacturing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".