A future food boom rescues the negative effects of cumulative early-life adversity on adult lifespan in a small mammal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Adverse early-life conditions, even when transient, can have long-lasting effects on individual phenotypes and reduce lifespan across species. If these effects can be mitigated. by a high quality later-life environment, then differences in future resource access may explain variation in vulnerability and resilience to early-life adversity. Using 32 years of data on 1,000+ wild North American red squirrels, we tested the hypothesis that the negative effects of early-life adversity on lifespan can be buffered by later-life food abundance. We found that although cumulative early-life adversity was negatively associated with adult lifespan, this relationship was modified by future food abundance. Squirrels that experienced a naturally-occurring future food boom in the second year of life did not suffer reduced longevity despite early-life adversity. Experimental supplementation with additional food did not replicate this effect, though it did increase adult lifespan overall. Our results suggest a non-deterministic role for early-life conditions on later-life phenotypes, and highlight the importance of contextualizing the influence of harsh early-life conditions over an animal’s entire life course.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".